House in Chaum / Prax Architectes

first_imgArchitects: Prax Architectes Area Area of this architecture project CopyAbout this officePrax ArchitectesOfficeFollow#TagsProjectsBuilt ProjectsSelected ProjectsResidential ArchitectureHousesSaint-GaudensWoodHousesFrancePublished on June 02, 2010Cite: “House in Chaum / Prax Architectes” 02 Jun 2010. ArchDaily. Accessed 12 Jun 2021. ISSN 0719-8884Read commentsBrowse the CatalogSinkshansgroheBathroom Mixers – Talis SVinyl Walls3MExterior Vinyl Finish – DI-NOC™ Solid ColorPartitionsSkyfoldRetractable Walls – Stepped & Sloped SpacesDining tablesZeitraumWood Table – TautBathroom AccessoriesBradley Corporation USARoll Towel Dispenser – Electronic TouchlessWoodLunawoodThermowood FacadesAluminium CompositesSculptformClick-on Battens in Victoria GardensMetal PanelsLongboard®Metal Ceilings – DauntlessWoodStructureCraftEngineering – Mass TimberPanels / Prefabricated AssembliesULMA Architectural SolutionsPerforated Facade PanelFiber Cements / CementsDuctal®Rainscreen Cladding Panels for Lightweight Facades in Apartment BlockBricksAcme BrickModular Size BrickMore products »Read commentsSave想阅读文章的中文版本吗?House in Chaum / Prax Architectes是否翻译成中文现有为你所在地区特制的网站?想浏览ArchDaily中国吗?Take me there »✖You’ve started following your first account!Did you know?You’ll now receive updates based on what you follow! Personalize your stream and start following your favorite authors, offices and users.Go to my stream ShareFacebookTwitterPinterestWhatsappMailOrhttps://www.archdaily.com/62431/house-in-chaum-prax-architectes Clipboard ShareFacebookTwitterPinterestWhatsappMailOrhttps://www.archdaily.com/62431/house-in-chaum-prax-architectes Clipboard Houses House in Chaum / Prax ArchitectesSave this projectSaveHouse in Chaum / Prax Architectes Projects Photographs:  Arnaud Saint-GermèsText description provided by the architects. Nature of the project The project relates to the construction of a house (particular Housing), of an office and garage (material storage for a company of maintenance of green areas). With a resolutely contemporary architecture, establishment and the organization of this building referent with the vernacular architecture of this area; namely: Save this picture!© Arnaud Saint-GermèsPlan in L Dwelling directed in the South Office and garage directed in the East Save this picture!© Arnaud Saint-GermèsProtection compared to the bad Western and Northern orientations; not or very few openings on these frontages Use of the existing vegetation in the West and North to accentuate protection compared to the bad orientations Save this picture!© Arnaud Saint-GermèsFramings on the surrounding sighSave this picture!© Arnaud Saint-GermèsProject gallerySee allShow lessSmall Houses / A1 ArchitectsArticlesWave House / Patrick NadeauArticles Share ArchDailycenter_img House in Chaum / Prax Architectes France “COPY” Area:  170 m² Photographs CopyHouses•Saint-Gaudens, France “COPY” Save this picture!© Arnaud Saint-Germès+ 28 Sharelast_img read more

MCA vs Dehli Gymkhana Club : NCLT Says ‘Using Public Plot In Lutyens Delhi On ₹1000 Annual Rent For Pastimes Prejudicial To Public Interest’

first_imgNews UpdatesMCA vs Dehli Gymkhana Club : NCLT Says ‘Using Public Plot In Lutyens Delhi On ₹1000 Annual Rent For Pastimes Prejudicial To Public Interest’ Karan Tripathi30 Jun 2020 10:55 PMShare This – xThe National Company Law Tribunal, Principal Bench at New Delhi, has directed the Central Government to constitute a special committee to look into the functioning of the Delhi Gymkhana Club. The Principal Bench headed by Acting President BSV Prakash Kumar has further directed the General Committee of the Club to not carry out the following activities: proceed with …Your free access to Live Law has expiredTo read the article, get a premium account.Your Subscription Supports Independent JournalismSubscription starts from ₹ 599+GST (For 6 Months)View PlansPremium account gives you:Unlimited access to Live Law Archives, Weekly/Monthly Digest, Exclusive Notifications, Comments.Reading experience of Ad Free Version, Petition Copies, Judgement/Order Copies.Subscribe NowAlready a subscriber?LoginThe National Company Law Tribunal, Principal Bench at New Delhi, has directed the Central Government to constitute a special committee to look into the functioning of the Delhi Gymkhana Club. The Principal Bench headed by Acting President BSV Prakash Kumar has further directed the General Committee of the Club to not carry out the following activities: proceed with any construction on site make any policy decision make any changes to the Memorandum of Association or Articles of Association utilise funds received from members conduct balloting The General Committee, however, is allowed to carry out the day to day functions of the club by utilising funds other than the fee collected from the members. The order has come in a company petition moved by the Ministry of Corporate Affairs against the General Committee of the Delhi Gymkhana Club under section 241(2) of the Companies Act, 2013, alleging that the affairs of the club are being conducted in manners prejudicial to the public interest. Therefore, the Central Government has sought Tribunal’s direction to allow it to nominate 15 persons as Directors on the General Committee of the Club to manage the affairs of it and report to this Tribunal on such matters as it may direct, including restructuring of the Club. While holding that the affairs of the club are, prima facie, being conducted in a manner prejudicial to public interest, the Tribunal directed the Centre to appoint two of its nominees of its choice as Members in the General Committee to monitor the affairs of the Club along with other GC Members and give suggestions to the GC. The Tribunal has further directed: ‘direct the Union of India to constitute a Special Committee with five Members of its choice to enquire into the affairs of the Club, utility of the land leased out by the State, with regard to constructions in progress without requisite approvals or with approvals, suggestions for changes in Articles and Memorandum of Association, membership issues including waitlist and about accelerated membership, adherence of the Club to the Rules governed by Section 8 of the Companies Act 2013 and other miscellaneous issues if any and file report of recommendations suggesting for better use of the club premises for the larger good in a transparent manner on equity basis within two months hereof.’ In order to justify the notion that the club is being run in a manner prejudicial to public interest, the Tribunal remarked: ‘Government owned land, is run by a coterie of people bringing in the children of permanent members and children’s children for using facilities of the club despite several members remaining outside for decades together, when Government Officer retires taking him into private members quota, and using crores of rupees collected from waitlist members as its own money, and using public property of 27 acres of land in the Lutyen’s Delhi adjacent to Prime Minister residence worth of thousands of crores on minimal annual rent of ₹1000 annual rent for lazing around in the evening for drinking amounts to prejudice to the public interest, all these are born out from the records, of course any interpretation could be given, but they cannot deny the fact that the club is basically for pastimes.’Click Here To Download Order[Read Order]Next Storylast_img read more